Autonomic Recovery Trajectories
Recent 30-Day Window vs Full History
| HRV Full | HRV 30d | Low HR Full | Low HR 30d | Avg HR Full | Avg HR 30d | Full-Period Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 9.9 | 12.0 ▲ +21.5% | 75.5 | 72.3 ▼ -4.2% | 83.9 | 80.7 ▼ -3.9% | IMPROVING (+0.58 ms/wk) Regression: 6 → 14 ms over 95 days |
| P2 | 50.9 | 42.6 ▼ -16.3% | 52.9 | 49.6 ▼ -6.1% | 62.1 | 58.7 ▼ -5.5% | DECLINING (-0.13 ms/wk) Regression: 56 → 46 ms over 1869 days |
| P3 | 26.7 | 26.7 — +0.0% | 52.3 | 52.3 — +0.0% | 57.2 | 57.2 — +0.0% | STABLE (-2.00 ms/wk) Regression: 30 → 23 ms over 21 days |
Full-period trend uses linear regression across each patient's entire data range. Declining = recent 30-day mean is more than 10% below full-history mean, indicating the full-history average overstates current health status.
Autonomic Recovery Trajectories
Heart Rate Comparison
Relative Recovery (% of Baseline)
HRV Distribution Comparison
Long-Term Context
Autonomic Coupling (HR vs HRV)
Clinical Context
This report compares two fundamentally different clinical trajectories. Patient 1 is 2+ years post-allogeneic HSCT with chronic GVHD and severe autonomic dysfunction (HRV consistently below the ESC 15ms threshold). Patient 2 is ~15 months post-stroke (bilateral carotid/vertebral artery dissection) with mildly impaired but recovering autonomic function. Direct HRV magnitude comparison is less meaningful than trajectory shape and relative changes within each patient's own range.
Normalization approaches (z-score, percent-of-baseline) allow meaningful cross-patient comparison despite the 5x difference in absolute HRV values. All heart rate values are derived from sleep periods (not readiness scores). Oura readiness 'resting_heart_rate' is a 0-100 score and is never used as bpm.